Offshore Wind Farm Maintenance

A new coating toolbox

Repair corroded structures and keep your wind farm operational with these innovative new maintenance and repair solutions from Sherwin-Williams.

Written by Claus Ackfeld, Joao Azevedo, and Neil Wilds, Sherwin-Williams, Protective and Marine.

Offshore wind farms operate in some of the toughest marine conditions on Earth, making these structures highly susceptible to abrasion and corrosion damage. Discover how Dura-Plate® 301W and Repacor™ SW-1000 from Sherwin-Williams provide exciting new possibilities for a simple, long-lasting repair that prolongs your wind farm's economic life.  

The offshore wind power sector is growing fast, but protecting these structures against corrosion in this aggressive environment can be problematic. Originally, their protection relied on the standards Norsok M-501 [1] and ISO 12944-9 [2], which give guidelines specific to the oil and gas industry but which were not necessarily suitable for the renewable sector – as a result, a lot of these early offshore wind towers suffered premature corrosion. Such assets are subject to early coating breakdown and corrosion, particularly in the inter-tidal and splash zones, due to a combination of factors: exposure to the most aggressive CX offshore atmospheric corrosiveness [2], unmanned – meaning no crew present for regular inspection or maintenance, structural movements much more pronounced than oil and gas offshore assets, and last but not the least, doubts about the usual offshore Oil & Gas coating specifications to provide extended durability when facing such aggressive conditions. Over the years, many coating systems have been used, including ceramic, solvent-free, glass-flake, and polyester, but premature corrosion breakdown has been detected in all systems used in the field.

The systems applied at new build to protect offshore wind foundations have not reached the 30+ year protection lifetime yet and probably never will – despite misleading predictions based on compositional requirements (as per the existing standards). As no one system currently meets the expectations of offshore operators, there is a need for a novel, cost-effective maintenance coating system.

There is no “silver bullet” system that meets all the requirements at new build, and major offshore energy companies are now setting up pre-qualification programmes for new build coating systems.

Hence, offshore wind operators are facing two important needs to ensure a prolonged life in an aggressive environment: 1) redefine the new construction coating specifications to ensure the required durability without the comfort of misleading Oil & Gas-based compositional coating standards, or track records; 2) find maintenance solutions addressing both the lack of environmental conditions control and difficult access. This article covers this second need.  

The New Maintenance Coating Toolbox

Maintenance and repair coating application differs from a new build/shop application situation in two key aspects: 1) reduced control over surface preparation quality and environmental conditions, and 2) difficult access to the areas to coat, and far more time consuming and costly than in shop.

Two technologies developed by Sherwin-Williams can enable asset owners and contractors alike to mitigate the negative impact of the above challenges in terms of cost, time of execution, and quality of protection. Both technologies address the need for surface preparation tolerance and are solvent-free. One is more tolerant to moisture, has a low surface profile and flash rust, and is suitable for larger repair projects (Dura-Plate 301W). The other is designed to facilitate the early repair of small areas of damage in difficult-to-access areas or during day-to-day operations by on-site staff, with minimal additional training needed (Repacor SW-1000). The latter is also a proven effective solution to repair damages during the handling, transportation and installation of offshore structures.

The uniqueness of both these technologies can expand owners’ and contractors’ options when designing these asset’s maintenance cycles. This is true for a vast array of energy and infrastructural assets, which one or another of these technologies can help, depending on access and scale of the repairs needed – or both used in combination if being considered early in the maintenance cycle. However, one specific activity provides the best example: offshore wind structures.

Maintenance Solutions

Before maintenance painting, the surface condition is important, and preparation needs to be minimal due to access/skilled labor availability. With regular inspections, maintenance intervals can be dependent on the percentage breakdown of the protective coating. As access is difficult offshore, the cost-effectiveness of any maintenance system is important, plus there is also a need to reduce the amount of downtime.

Talk to to a technical advisor

Contact us

Back To Top