Offshore Wind Farm Maintenance
A new coating toolbox
Repair corroded structures and keep your wind farm operational with these innovative new maintenance and repair solutions from Sherwin-Williams.
Written by Claus Ackfeld, Joao Azevedo, and Neil Wilds, Sherwin-Williams, Protective and Marine.
Offshore wind farms operate in some of the toughest marine conditions on Earth, making these structures highly susceptible to abrasion and corrosion damage. Discover how Dura-Plate® 301W and Repacor™ SW-1000 from Sherwin-Williams provide exciting new possibilities for a simple, long-lasting repair that prolongs your wind farm's economic life.
The offshore wind power sector is growing fast, but protecting these structures against corrosion in this aggressive environment can be problematic. Originally, their protection relied on the standards Norsok M-501 [1] and ISO 12944-9 [2], which give guidelines specific to the oil and gas industry but which were not necessarily suitable for the renewable sector – as a result, a lot of these early offshore wind towers suffered premature corrosion. Such assets are subject to early coating breakdown and corrosion, particularly in the inter-tidal and splash zones, due to a combination of factors: exposure to the most aggressive CX offshore atmospheric corrosiveness [2], unmanned – meaning no crew present for regular inspection or maintenance, structural movements much more pronounced than oil and gas offshore assets, and last but not the least, doubts about the usual offshore Oil & Gas coating specifications to provide extended durability when facing such aggressive conditions. Over the years, many coating systems have been used, including ceramic, solvent-free, glass-flake, and polyester, but premature corrosion breakdown has been detected in all systems used in the field.
The systems applied at new build to protect offshore wind foundations have not reached the 30+ year protection lifetime yet and probably never will – despite misleading predictions based on compositional requirements (as per the existing standards). As no one system currently meets the expectations of offshore operators, there is a need for a novel, cost-effective maintenance coating system.
There is no “silver bullet” system that meets all the requirements at new build, and major offshore energy companies are now setting up pre-qualification programmes for new build coating systems.
Hence, offshore wind operators are facing two important needs to ensure a prolonged life in an aggressive environment: 1) redefine the new construction coating specifications to ensure the required durability without the comfort of misleading Oil & Gas-based compositional coating standards, or track records; 2) find maintenance solutions addressing both the lack of environmental conditions control and difficult access. This article covers this second need.
The New Maintenance Coating Toolbox
Maintenance and repair coating application differs from a new build/shop application situation in two key aspects: 1) reduced control over surface preparation quality and environmental conditions, and 2) difficult access to the areas to coat, and far more time consuming and costly than in shop.
Two technologies developed by Sherwin-Williams can enable asset owners and contractors alike to mitigate the negative impact of the above challenges in terms of cost, time of execution, and quality of protection. Both technologies address the need for surface preparation tolerance and are solvent-free. One is more tolerant to moisture, has a low surface profile and flash rust, and is suitable for larger repair projects (Dura-Plate 301W). The other is designed to facilitate the early repair of small areas of damage in difficult-to-access areas or during day-to-day operations by on-site staff, with minimal additional training needed (Repacor SW-1000). The latter is also a proven effective solution to repair damages during the handling, transportation and installation of offshore structures.
The uniqueness of both these technologies can expand owners’ and contractors’ options when designing these asset’s maintenance cycles. This is true for a vast array of energy and infrastructural assets, which one or another of these technologies can help, depending on access and scale of the repairs needed – or both used in combination if being considered early in the maintenance cycle. However, one specific activity provides the best example: offshore wind structures.
Maintenance Solutions
Before maintenance painting, the surface condition is important, and preparation needs to be minimal due to access/skilled labor availability. With regular inspections, maintenance intervals can be dependent on the percentage breakdown of the protective coating. As access is difficult offshore, the cost-effectiveness of any maintenance system is important, plus there is also a need to reduce the amount of downtime.
Dura-Plate 301W
Dura-Plate 301W, a surface tolerant 2k, is an ideal solution for the repair of larger surface areas.
301W is the latest evolution of the Dura-Plate 301 series of products, with a track record in offshore and onshore applications spanning over 25 years and with over 15 million m2 protected in offshore projects alone. It is a low-temperature application and curing version of the Dura-Plate 301K ultra-surface and moisture-tolerant high-solids epoxy coating platform. Dura-Plate 301W may be applied at ambient and substrate temperatures as low as 2°C. It is engineered to provide outstanding adhesion and anti-corrosion performance over a wide range of surface preparation techniques, including water jetting, abrasive blasting, and hand or power tool cleaning. The unique formulation of Dura-Plate 301W allows it to be applied over damp and medium flash-rusted metal substrates (tolerant to Wa2 M – ISO 8501-4) and without dew point restrictions. It is tolerant to low surface profile roughness and is easy to apply with a single-leg airless spray, brush, or roller. A typical coating system would be 2x125-150 microns. These characteristics significantly broaden the acceptable application windows to drive efficiencies in coating schedules for both new construction and maintenance projects, and thus ideal for offshore wind tower structures.
301W has been assessed by operators in both the offshore and onshore energy sectors for its adhesion to damp, low profile and abrasive blasted surfaces and its suitability as a surface and humidity-tolerant coating to reduce traditional downtime in maintenance painting due to weather conditions.
The performance of a single coat of 301W on rusty steel (prepared to St3) was assessed after 5,000 hours of exposure to artificial weathering (ISO 11507) [3] and humidity (BS 3900 F2) [4]. No coating defects were observed in either test.
Third-party testing confirmed the excellent adhesion of a single coat of Dura-Plate 301W at an average DFT of approx. 250 microns to various substrates (damp, low surface profile), all cured under 100% relative humidity, with average pull-off adhesion above 15 MPa, and where the failure mode was either cohesive or partially glue failure (Figure 1).
Figure 1: 301W Panels after pull-off testing, showing failure mode and measured values. Figure also shows results from adhesion testing of a previous version of the 301 series.
Note: top dollies on Panels 1 and 6 show results after the second attempt to pull. The first attempt showed no failure, with dollies in place after interrupting pull-off when the dial reaches 25 MPa (maximum)
No detachment was observed between the coating film and the substrate in any of the twelve pull-off readings performed over six panels. In addition, no meaningful difference or trend was detected between the adhesion over dry abrasive blasted steel and adhesion over damp or smooth non-blasted steel. Curing at the 100% humidity and temperatures tested was normal and did not impact the results. A third-party laboratory was commissioned to carry out flexibility testing of Dura-Plate 301W coated samples using a four-point bend method. Ten sample plates (250 x 25 x 6 mm) were coated with a single coat of Dura-Plate 301W at an average DFT of 220 microns and evaluated at 3% and 5% strain testing (Figure 2).
Figure 2: 301W Flexibility samples after 4-point bend testing
No cracking or failure was observed after testing at both 3% strain and 5% strain.
In a further evaluation by an offshore maintenance services company, the report stated that during application, it was clear that the 301W was easy to apply with brush and roller, that the coating spreads smoothly, and that once dried, the surface becomes smooth and glossy. When applied with a brush in the usual manner, it's easy to achieve a dry film thickness ranging from 150 to 200 µm. With the necessary attention, a dry film thickness of 250 to 300 µm with just one coat on flat and easily accessible surfaces was easily achieved. The adhesion of the 301W on a Sa 2.5 blasted substrate was good. Even under extreme conditions (exaggerated) with a too-wet surface, the adhesion remained good, and the adhesion on the substrate exhibiting heavy flash rusting (Grade H) even achieved an adhesion value of 8 MPa. When evaluated as a maintenance coating system at an onshore asset, it was found to be effective in reducing downtime during scheduled maintenance by around 70%, which computed to cost savings of approximately £135,000 ($170,000 USD).
Repacor SW-1000
For small area (spot) repair, Repacor SW-1000 is very suitable and has a good record in this application. The advantage of this product is that it is a two-component solvent-free ultra-fast drying coating supplied in a cartridge, which can easily be applied by less-skilled staff, e.g. rope access technicians (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Rope access technician conducting spot repair.
Repacor SW-1000 is the result of a three-year research product by Sherwin-Williams to develop a coating solution that could simplify maintenance repair work on offshore wind structures. The safety of rope-access applicators using this product was also a prime consideration in the development. Compared to the 2-3 layers needed with traditional technologies, it requires only a single layer coating, easily dispensed using a standard sealant gun, without the need for mixing, to obtain the necessary performance. Repacor is compliant with NORSOK M-501 [1] and meets the highest standards in anti-corrosion protection. Repacor SW-1000 has all the properties of traditional multi-coat protection systems built into a single coat of 500-micron dry film thickness. Despite the single coat, it is expected to mimic the original performance of offshore wind structure coating systems. It is UV-resistant and no additional topcoat is needed, which is a major advantage in offshore environments. It also has a cure time that is around four hours faster than alternative aerosol systems, and the unique cartridge application process means the applicator can effectively work from a backpack, so it only requires one visit to carry out the repair, whilst waste packaging is also minimized.
Figure 4: Pull-Off adhesion test, and scribe corrosion test results.
Note: the central section of the scribe shows the repair area. Adhesion after qualification testing was > 9 MPa (100% cohesive break), there was zero degree of blistering, rusting, cracking, flaking, and chalking, and corrosion at the scribe of the repair area averaged 2mm. Examples of spot repairs using Repacor SW-1000 carried out in the field are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
Both a battery-operated bristle blaster for surface preparation and the Repacor cartridge can be carried in the backpack of a rope access technician, enabling an easy-to-apply 1-coat fix, saving money and time. In addition, one of the main properties needed from a repair system is good adhesion to the existing substrate after suitable preparation, together with continued good corrosion protection. Third-party testing was carried out to determine both the adhesion of Repacor SW-1000 and its suitability for providing corrosion protection in this environment.
Coated steel panels, which had been exposed to a corrosive environment, were repaired using Repacor SW-1000 and then subjected to 4,200 hours of cyclic corrosion protection tests in accordance with ISO 20340 Annex A after removal of the damaged coating by spot grit basting to SA 21/2, and manual application of one coat of Repacor SW-1000 at 500 microns DFT.
After testing, the panels were visually assessed, followed by adhesion testing and measurement of corrosion at the scribe. The results are given in Table 1 and Figure 4.
Repacor SW-1000 transforms the maintenance and repair of offshore wind turbine towers and additionally provides an excellent solution for onshore industrial environments where a simple-to-apply, high-performance, durable and cost-effective coating is required.
Repacor SW-1000 Application Process
Figure 5: The application stages of Repacor SW-1000 maintenance coating.
A - Area prepared
B - Repacor SW-1000 applied from the cartridge
C, D - Smoothing the applied material
E - Repair complete
Figure 6: Preparation and application of Repacor SW-1000
A - Rusted area requiring repair
B - Surface preparation using an angle grinder
C - Surface is now prepared and ready for coating
D - Repacor SW-1000 application
Table 1: Repacor SW-1000 Test Results
Evaluation before exposure
Specimen 1 | Specimen 2 | Specimen 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
DIN EN ISO 2808 | Film thickness [µm] | 506 - 607 | 539 - 692 | 497 - 544 |
DIN EN ISO 4624 | Adhesion strength [MPa] | 8,7 MPa | 8,2 MPa | 8,3 MPa |
DIN EN ISO 4624 | Failure type AB | 10 % AB | 10 % AB | 10 % AB |
DIN EN ISO 4624 | Failure type B | 90 % B | 90 % B | 90 % B |
Evaluation after exposure
Duration: 4200 hours (500 microns)
Specimen 1 | Specimen 2 | Specimen 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adhesion strength [MPa] | 10,5 MPa | 9,3 MPa | 9,8 MPa | |
DIN EN ISO 4624 | Failure type | 100 % B | 100 % B | 100 % B |
Corrosion at the scribe | [mm] | 2,6 | 1,6 | 1,8 |
DIN EN ISO 4628-2 | Degree of blistering | 0 (SO) | 0 (SO) | 0 (SO) |
DIN EN ISO 4628-3 | Degree of rusting | Ri O | Ri 0 | Ri 0 |
DIN EN ISO 4628-4 | Degree of cracking | 0 (SO) | 0 (SO) | 0 (SO) |
DIN EN ISO 4628-5 | Degree of flaking | 0 (SO) | 0 (SO) | 0 (SO) |
DIN EN ISO 4628-6 | Chalking | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Testing was carried out by Fraunhofer IFAM, Bremen, Germany, and results are reproduced with approval.
New Maintenance Strategy
In addition to our new maintenance coating toolbox for offshore wind structures, a new strategy is proposed to ensure the successful long-term operation of wind farms. Learning from the experiences gained by operators in the offshore oil and gas sector, we know that regular inspection and maintenance is key to protecting these platforms throughout the wind farm's operating life. This is vital in ensuring the wind farm generates maximum revenue. However, there is a big difference between offshore oil and gas assets and wind tower structures. Oil and gas platforms are manned and are therefore continually inspected for corrosion problems, with workers readily able to carry out spot repairs to the coating before the breakdown becomes serious and requires major repainting. By contrast, offshore wind structures are unmanned, meaning regular inspections of the tower and maintenance or remedial painting work is not straightforward.
Figure 7: Wind blade inspection
The intertidal and splash zones (as with oil and gas platforms) are the major areas where coating breakdown and corrosion is found. This is due to the regular alternating between wet and dry periods in these areas, as well as impact/abrasion damage caused by boat access. These are also the areas on offshore structures which are most difficult to access. However, there is a strategy which could be put in place to help. The wind turbine blades also need maintenance over the lifetime of the wind farm to ensure long-term successful operation. Inspections take place at regular intervals, for example, the first 5 years of operation, then at roughly 10-year intervals to determine any required maintenance or replacement of the turbine blades. This is carried out by rope access technicians sent out by vessel to the tower, who could also be tasked with inspecting the base of the tower and applying Repacor to any damaged areas with minimum additional training needed. This helps to ensure long-term corrosion protection of these high-risk areas.
Conclusions
Solutions serving the most demanding scenario (offshore wind structures) will perform well in any other maintenance and repair situation. The relative usefulness and cost-benefit balance of Dura-Plate 301W and Repacor SW-1000 approaches will be different on a case-to-case basis, which is the reason why it is important to count on both solutions in the maintenance & repair toolbox. Each one alone or in combination can be used in offshore Oil & Gas, onshore energy assets, bridges and highways and other situations wherever difficult application conditions are in the way of achieving durability of repairs using conventional solutions.
References
[1] Norsok M-501 Rev 6
[2] ISO 12944-9 Paints and varnishes — Corrosion protection of steel structures by protective paint systems— Part 9: Protective paint systems and laboratory performance test methods for offshore and related structures
[3] ISO 11507 Paints and varnishes – Exposure of coatings to artificial weathering – Exposure to fluorescent UV lamps and water
[4] BS 3900 F2 Methods of test for paint. Durability tests on paint films. Determination of resistance to humidity (cyclic condensation)
Discover More
Industry Expertise and Innovation
Explore customised solutions we deliver for customers to address their project and application challenges.